نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه گلستان، گرگان، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری زبان‌شناسی کاربردی، گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، واحد علی آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد‌ اسلامی، علی‌آباد کتول، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر آموزش تلویحی و تشریحی با استفاده از برش‌های ویدئویی بر درک کاربردشناسی دو کنش گفتاری معذرت‌خواهی و امتناع پرداخته است. به این منظور، تعداد 49 دانشجوی ترم اول رشته ادبیات و آموزش زبان انگلیسی سطح متوسط از دانشگاه گلستان برمبنای آزمون تعیین‌سطح آکسفوردبه عنوان جمعیت نمونه انتخاب شدند. محدوده سنی این زبان‌آموزان، بین 18 الی 33 سال بود. زبان‌آموزان به صورت تصادفی در سه گروه آموزش تلویحی، آموزش تشریحی و کنترل طبقه‌بندی شدند. در گروه‌ تشریحی، زبان‌آموزان توضیحات فراکاربردشناسی، بازخوردهای مستقیم وآموزش‌های مستقیم ارتقاءآگاهی دریافت کردند. درحالیکه، زبان‌آموزان گروه تلویحی تحت آموزش ضمنی قرارگرفتند. در آموزش گروه تلویحی و تشریحی از 60 کلیپ ویدئویی استفاده شد که از سریال فرار از زندان و مجموعه‌ی فیلم‌کتاب تاچ‌ استون 2 اقتباس شده ‌بودند. در مقابل، گروه کنترل هیچ‌گونه آموزشی برای یادگیری نحوه‌ی استفاده از کنش‌های گفتاری معذرت‌خواهی و امتناع دریافت نکردند و بخش‌های مختلف کتاب تاچستون 2 تدریس شد. قبل و بعد از دوره 10 جلسه‌ی آموزش، هر سه گروه در آزمون تکمیل کلام چندگزینه‌ای شرکت کردند. نتایج حاصل از آزمون تحلیل واریانس یک متغیره نشان داد که درک زبان‌آموزان ازکنش گفتاری معذرت‌خواهی و امتناع در گروه آموزش تلویحی و تشریحی، پس از اجرای تدریس ارتقاء و پیشرفت داشته است. علاوه بر این، نتایج آزمون شفه نشان داد عملکرد گروه آموزش تشریحی بهتر از گروه تلویحی بوده و همچنین عملکرد گروه آموزش تلویحی بهتر از گروه کنترل بوده است. به معلمان زبان انگلیسی پیشنهاد می‌شود تا از برش‌های ویدیویی به همراه آموزش تشریحی بیشتر بهره گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Implicit vs. Explicit Metapragmatic Instruction on the Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Comprehension of Apology and Refusal

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Derakhshan 1
  • Farzaneh Shakki 2

1 Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran

2 Ph.D Student, Applied Linguistics, Department of English Language Education, Ali Abad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

چکیده [English]

Within the broad domain of SLA, ‘pragmatic competence’ was brought to the fore following the assertation of communicative competence, but explicitly premiered in Bachman’s (1990) model of communicative competence, accentuating the significance of the relationship between “language users and the context of communication” (p.89). The vitality of L2 pragmatic competence alongside grammatical competence is the main motive behind the multitudinous number of studies carried out since the communicative revolution in language teaching in an effort to improve L2 pragmatics instruction. Ever since, a welter of studies have sought answers to three main questions as constituting the essence of interlanguage pragmatic competence research: whether and how pragmatic competence can be instructed, whether instruction is more effective than no instruction, and whether different instructional approaches addressing interlanguage pragmatics can be differentially effective (Kasper & Rose, 2002). Scholarships have corroborated that pragmatic features are amenable to instruction; however, more research is still needed to find out which interventional approaches and what type of instructional input and materials are more conducive to learning. One potential framework within which pragmatic competence can be investigated from an acquisitional perspective is Schmidt’s (1993) noticing hypothesis and Sharwood Smith’s (1981) consciousness raising. Since these postulations, a large number of studies have been conducted to substantiate claims as to the significance of learners’ pragmatic consciousness for interlanguage development. However, the pendulum has swung towards the production of speech acts, and comprehension of speech acts in interlanguage pragmatic competence seems to be an under-explored area of research. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of implicit vs. explicit instruction on the pragmatic comprehension of two speech acts of apology ‎and refusal being taught through video prompts. These two speech acts were opted because of their face-threating features. In doing so, a quasi-experimental pretest posttest research design was used. To this end, of 68 initial participants, 49 (F=33; M=16) intermediate EFL learners majoring English Literature and Teaching English as a Foreign Language from a state university were selected ‎based on Oxford Quick Placement Test (2004). The age of these participants ranged from 18 to 33. ‎These participants were randomly assigned into three groups: explicit, implicit, and ‎control. The explicit and implicit treatment groups received two different types of instruction accompanied ‎by specific tasks on pragmatic awareness using 60 video-driven prompts extracted from Prison Break movie series and Touchstone 2 video book series (Höst, 2006). The explicit group received metalinguistic explanation, feedback, and discussion, whereas the implicit group received implicit feedback through examples. In contrast, the control group did not receive any specific instruction on the use of apology and refusals and they were taught different sections of Touchstone 2. A validated Multiple-choice Discourse Completion Test (MCDCT) which consists of 128 items including 8 conversations for the speech act of refusal and 8 conversations for the speech act of apology was used. The results of running One-way ANOVA indicated that learners’ comprehension of speech act of apology and refusal across the two treatment groups developed after the treatment, and they outperformed the control group. Moreover, the explicit‎ group outperformed the implicit group and the control group. The present paper recapitulates some pedagogical implications for materials developers, teachers, and learners. In the light of the results gained, it was proved that instruction had a positive influence on the pragmatic comprehension of apologies and refusals, substantiating that pragmatics is impervious to teaching drawing on dichotomous (explicit vs. implicit) approaches of language teaching. With respect to learning pragmatics, learners are advised to pay attention to the language forms, sociocultural facets of language and the germane contextual factors that could possibly affect the forms in the given context. The results suggest that sole exposure to contextualized input, video vignettes, may not necessarily result in students’ gain in pragmatics. Consequently, learning is augmented if the linguistic, analytic, and cultural features along with sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic features are brought to learners’ attention. Moreover, when instructing various speech acts, sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic features in the movies should be taught directly and explicitly which per se contributes to more pragmatic awareness and comprehension. Our findings are suggestive of the fact that scenes from movies serve as a contextualized source of pragmatic input inasmuch as they encompass a myriads of conversational exchanges in which the speaker’s reply does not provide a straightforward answer to the question. To obviate such a downside, audiovisual materials can be capitalized upon to enrich our language classes if students are provided with explicit feedback and practice. In a nutshell, it can be argued that sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic features, through video-driven materials to simulate real life situations, should be juxtaposed in the textbooks by textbook developers and materials designers.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pragmatics
  • Implicit Instruction
  • Explicit instruction
  • Apology
  • Refusal